Published by BioScientifica
Society for Endocrinology Annual Meeting 2005

Society for Endocrinology Annual Meeting 2005

London, UK
07 November 2005 - 09 November 2005
Society for Endocrinology

Endocrine Abstracts (2005) 10 P41

An audit on hypercalcaemia. Tools of the trade

AN Arefin & C White

Pontefract General Infirmary, Pontefract, United Kingdom.


Introduction: Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP) is common; Prevalence and Incidence are now much higher than the past. There is also a change in practice related to medical management, surveillance, and defining criteria for diagnosis as well as the recommendation for surgery.

Objective: *To look at the management of hypercalcaemia at Pontefract General Infirmary among all medical specialities, especially with regards to Primary Hyperparathyroidism. *To raise the awareness of the current trend in the management of Asymptomatic Primary Hyperparathyroidism.

Methodology: Case notes study of 40 randomly selected cases of Hypercalcaemia over 12 months period and compare them against the Guidelines for parathyroid surgery in asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism – by Consensus Development Panel, NIH, USA: *Serum calcium (above ULN) >0.25 mmol/l; *24 h urinary calcium excretion >10 mmol/day; *Creatinine clearance reduced by 30%; *BMD t-score < −2.5 at any site; *Age <50 years.

Result: Gender split (n=40) 30% male, 70% female; Age range 35 to 93 years. Mean age 74 years. 16 case of confirmed Primary Hyperparathyroidism (n=16); age range: 1 (35 −50 years); 4 (51–70 years); 10 (71–90 years); 1 over 90 years.1 out of 16 had Sestamibi scan; 2 out of 16 had 24 h urinary calcium excretion measured; 4 out of 16 had Renal USS; 5 out of 16 had USS of neck; all of them had PTH but none of them had BMD measured. 11 of them had calcium range between 2.6–2.85 mmol/L; 4 had between 2.86–3.00 mmol/L; 1 had calcium above 3.00 mmol/L. Only 1 person had parathyroid surgery who was 69 & had Ca++ level of 3.03 mmol/L.

Conclusions:

  1. Decision to send patients for surgery was considered primarily on their calcium level.

  2. Other criteria for surgery were largely ignored.

  3. End organ damages were vastly ignored as well.


Endocrine Abstracts (2005) 10 P41