Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2012) 29 P820

Policlinico “A. Gemelli” - Catholic University, Rome, Italy.


Introduction: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a treatment choice for inoperable or metastasized neuroendocrine tumours and this therapy seems more effective in the biochemical and volume control of disease than somatostatin analogues (SSA).

Aims: To demonstrate the efficacy of medical therapy with SSA and PRRT in patients with well and moderately differentiated neuroendocrine tumours.

Materials and methods: We evaluated 60 patients (29 males, 31 females; mean age at diagnosis 53±17 years) affected by well and moderately differentiated neuroendocrine tumours. 26 patients (43%) were affected by bronchial carcinoids, 16 patients (27%) by intestinal neuroendocrine tumours, 15 patients (25%) by pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, 3 patients (5%) by metastases from neuroendocrine carcinoma of unknown origin. 25 patients (42%) with either metastatic or recurrent disease, unresectable primary tumours or symptoms of hormone excess were treated with SSA. Among these, 10 patients (17%) with metastatic disease or unresectable primary tumours with intense hyperuptake at the Octreoscan underwent 2 to 7 cycles of PRRT with 90Y-DOTATOC or 177Lu-DOTATATE. Mean follow up was 41±10 months.

Results: Medical treatment with SSA allowed control of symptoms related to hormone excess in all patients but 1 with refractory carcinoid syndrome. Among the patients that underwent PRRT, 6 (60%) had minor or partial response, 3 (30%) had stable disease while 1 patient had progression of disease. Interestingly, 3 of the 6 patients with minor or partial response to PRRT had further progression with a mean PFS of 12.7 months.

Conclusions: Medical treatment with SSA allowed control of hormone secretion in the majority of patients. PRRT allowed minor or partial response of disease in a high proportion of treated patients. However, among these, a relatively high proportion of patients had further progression of disease.

Declaration of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project.

Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.

Volume 29

15th International & 14th European Congress of Endocrinology

European Society of Endocrinology 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.