Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2013) 32 P965 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.32.P965

ECE2013 Poster Presentations Pituitary – Clinical (<emphasis role="italic">Generously supported by IPSEN</emphasis>) (127 abstracts)

Central hypothyroidism and adjusted thyroxine dose study (CHATS): impact of increasing free thyroxine levels in patients with hypopituitarism

Anna-Elisabeth H Minder 1 , Andreas Jostel 2 , Claire E Higham 1 , W David J Ryder 3 , Peter J Trainer 1 & Stephen M Shalet 1


1Department of Endocrinology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; 2Department of Endocrinology, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, UK; 3Department of Medical Statistics, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.


Introduction: Patients with pituitary deficiencies suffer from impaired quality of life regardless of substitution therapy with hydrocortisone, thyroxine (T4), sex hormones or GH. Central hypothyroidism (CH) is difficult to diagnose and treat because symptoms are non-specific and TSH-levels cannot be used for assessment. There is no consensus for the fT4-goal of thyroxine-replacement in patients with CH.

Aim: To determine the impact of increased fT4 on quality of life in patients with hypopituitarism.

Methods: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of additional T4-supplementation. 40 patients (age 20–70 years) with hypopituitarism and fT4-levels in the lowest third of normal reference range were included. Patients received placebo or T4-titration aiming for fT4 levels in the upper third of reference range, irrespective of TSH values. Total study duration 42 weeks (24 weeks dose adjustment, 18 weeks stable dose). Quality of life assessments (QoL) using four questionnaires (SF-36v2, PGWBS, EQ-5D, AGHDA) at baseline and end of study. Statistics were performed using an analysis of covariance.

Results: The increase in fT4-values in the treatment group did not translate into significant changes in vitality score as assessed by SF-36v2 (estimated treatment effect 4.65 (95% CI −7.86, 17.15) or general health score (estimated treatment effect is 1.57 (−8.19, 11.33)), nor in any of the other questionnaires (PGWBS −1.11 (−8.80, 6.58); AGHD 0.88 (−2.77, 4.53); EQ5D-VAS −4.40 (−13.45, 4.65)).

Conclusion: The increase of fT4 to the upper third of normal range did not significantly change the vitality score, general health or quality of life in hypopituitary patients and therefore does not provide support for the commonly used strategy of thyroxine-supplementation to the upper limit of normal. With 40 patients, however, the study may be underpowered to detect small effects. Other explanations for lack of effect include an inappropriately high or low fT4 goal and further research is required.

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.