Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2014) 36 OC1.1 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.36.OC1.1

BSPED2014 Oral Communications Oral Communications 1 (2 abstracts)

Paediatric pituitary adenomas: rare, complex, and by no means benign

Hoong-Wei Gan 1 , Chloe Bulwer 1 , Owase Jeelani 2 , Marta Korbonits 3 & Helen Spoudeas 2


1University College London Institute of Child Health, London, UK; 2Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; 3William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.


Introduction: Pituitary adenomas (PAs) account for <3% of all paediatric supratentorial tumours. Despite being benign, they can cause significant tumour- and treatment-related neuroendocrine and visual morbidity. Patients may be the index case for syndromes such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1).

Case report: Patient R was referred at 11.9 years with longstanding headaches and bilateral visual deterioration to the point of near-blindness. MRI revealed a large supra-intrasellar tumour causing third ventricular compression. Emergency debulking was initially scheduled for a suspected craniopharyngioma to preserve remaining vision. However, pre-treatment biochemistry revealed severe hyperprolactinaemia (PRL 23723 mU/l) alongside GH and TSH deficiencies. Surgery was deferred in favour of cabergoline therapy with an initial brisk response (PRL nadir 1993 mU/l) after a dose of 250 μg/week.

Unfortunately, despite escalating doses to 7 mg/week, his tumour demonstrated continued biochemical escape with radiological progression, requiring two partial resections (histology confirming a macroprolactinoma) and adjuvant proton beam radiotherapy. He suffered a post-operative stroke following his second operation and is now completely blind.

Initial questioning revealed only one paternal first cousin and one maternal first half-cousin (both once removed) with macroprolactinomas (i.e. no common ancestor). Patient R was positive for a functionally deleterious heterozygous MEN1 splicing mutation (c.784-9G>A). After multiple consultations, a history of multiple relatives with prolactinomas, hyperparathyroidism, and gastrinomas was revealed (the latter in a maternal grandaunt with a confirmed diagnosis of MEN1) within an inter-generationally multiply consanguineous family, with other members requiring screening.

Conclusions: This case demonstrates: i) the importance of excluding PAs by pre-treatment biochemistry as management differs from other suprasellar tumours, (ii) the difficulties in prioritising disease control against preservation of neuroendocrine and visual function without a clear evidence base, and (iii) the crucial need for a careful family history and universal genetic testing to identify the need for screening of relatives.

Volume 36

42nd Meeting of the British Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes

British Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.