Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2017) 51 OC8.3 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.51.OC8.3

BSPED2017 Oral Communications Oral Communications 8 (3 abstracts)

Parent reported outcomes in conditions affecting sex development

Zoe Macqueen 1 , Melissa Gardner 2 , David E Sandberg 2 & Syed Faisal Ahmed 1


1Developmental Endocrinology Research Group, Royal Hospital for Children, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; 2Child Health & Evaluation Research Centre, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.


Background: There are gaps in our understanding of the impact of conditions that affect sex development, such as DSD and CAH, on the parent and patient.

Aims: The project aimed to explore whether patient reported outcomes (PRO), assessed by standardised questionnaires, could be integrated within routine paediatric endocrine clinic visits.

Methods: Previous validated questionnaires were used to develop a parent Self-Report questionnaire containing eight domains (40 items) for caregivers of children <7 years. Domains were derived from a validated DSD-specific measure and a brief screening measure for adult depression and anxiety. A parallel parent Proxy-Report questionnaire containing eight domains (30 items) and assessing the child’s adaptation was also developed. Each subscale was scored as the raw score and presented as a standard deviation score (SDS) relative to a DSD or healthy population depending on subscale. Parents of 31 children were approached and 24 (12 - conditions affecting sex development, 12 - other endocrine conditions) completed the forms. 27 parents completed the parent Self-Report questionnaire and 15 parents the Proxy-Report.

Results: Both questionnaires were found to be acceptable for routine use in clinic and took less than 10 minutes to complete. On the parent Self-Report scale, the median (range) SDS score for ‘Future Concerns’ was −0.35 (−1.87, 1.04) and 1.04 (−2.00, 1.73) for mothers of children with conditions affecting sex development compared to other endocrine conditions, respectively (P=0.02). ‘Talking to Others’, ‘Stigma’ and ‘Surgery’ also had a lower score in parents of children with a condition affecting sex development but these were not significantly different from the other group. Although both groups of parents had mainly positive SDS on the Proxy-Report, parents of these children tended to score lower than those of children with other endocrine conditions on the majority of the subscales.

Conclusions: Parents of children with conditions affecting sex development reported greater levels of stress, particularly relating to future concerns. These questionnaires can be used as a routine health care evaluation and their use may allow greater targeting of support as well as the development of clinical benchmarks.

Volume 51

45th Meeting of the British Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes

British Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.