Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2018) 56 P492 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.56.P492

ECE2018 Poster Presentations: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Diabetes therapy (43 abstracts)

Can patient profile influence on GLP1 analogues prescription among physicians?: patient selection and perspectives

Manuel Cayón-Blanco & Carolina García-Figueras-Mateos


Hospital SAS Jerez de la Frontera, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain.


Introduction: The use of glucagon like peptide 1 analogues (GLP1a) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is growing. After a decade-long effort to improve the pharmacokinetics of GLP1, a number of GLP1a are currently available on the market. With a view to identifying patient characteristics that could influence physicians’ prescription of different GLP1a we carried out this observational study in routine clinical practice conditions. Outcomes after add-on these drugs were described as well.

Methods/design: The study was based on a retrospective design and the following variables were collected to identify potential influencing factors in patient profile at baseline: gender, age, time of evolution of T2DM, body mass index (BMI), HbA1c level and treatment with insulin. To measure outcomes, changes in HbA1c and BMI at 6 months after add-on, were assessed.

Results: 75 poorly controlled patients with T2DM who received any GLP1a as add-on therapy were analysed. There was a homogeneus distribution of patients according to the drugs evaluated (one-third of sample for each one: exenatide-LAR [EL], dulaglutide [D] and liraglutide [L]). At baseline, patients on D were older as compared to other GLP1a (D: 60.8±10.8 vs EL: 51.8±10 vs L: 54.2±10.2 years; P=0.008). There was a nonsignificant trend to prescribe EL in patients with higher BMI ([Kg/m2]: EL: 41.8±8.8 vs L: 40.7±7.3 vs D: 37.8±6.9; P=0.17) and D to patients with higher level of HbA1c ([%]: D: 9.2±1.4 vs EL: 8.7±1.7 vs L: 8.5±1.1; P=0.23). No significant changes in HbA1c and BMI reductions were detected among drugs at 6 months. The highest HbA1c reductions were reached with D (−1.9±1.5% vs EL: −1.2±1.1% vs L: −1.5±1%; P=0.13). BMI reductions were also equivalent among groups.

Conclusions: According to the trends of use of GLP1a, we can conclude that there is a nonsignificant perception of a higher HbA1c-lowering effect and better security profile for D and a higher weight-lowering effect for EL among physicians. Nevertheless, HbA1c and BMI reductions are equivalent among different types of GLP1a in our routine clinical practice.

Volume 56

20th European Congress of Endocrinology

Barcelona, Spain
19 May 2018 - 22 May 2018

European Society of Endocrinology 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.

Authors