Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2023) 94 P351 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.94.P351

SFEBES2023 Poster Presentations Metabolism, Obesity and Diabetes (70 abstracts)

Time-restricted eating in polycystic ovarian syndrome: a randomised crossover feasibility study of real-world clinical advice

Ruairí Floyd 1,2,3 , James Gibney 1,3 , Lisa Owens 4 , Niamh Phelan 4 , Ana Rakovac 5 , Carel Le Roux 6 , Sinead Duggan 7 & Lucy Ann Behan 1,2,3


1Department of Endocrinology, Robert Graves Institute of Endocrinology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. 2The Coombe Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. 3Department of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. 4Department of Endocrinology, St. James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. 5Department of Clinical Chemistry, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. 6Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. 7Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland


Objective: Time-restricted eating (TRE) represents a novel intervention that may improve insulinaemia and reduce weight, but is untested in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). In a randomised interventional study (NCT05126199), we investigated the feasibility of TRE in PCOS. Secondary objectives included effects on insulin and metabolic indices.

Methods: Participants were randomised to 12-week TRE (18h fast/6h eating window) or ‘ab-libitum’ (no time-restriction) and crossed over. Primary outcomes assessed recruitment, compliance, safety, and drop-outs. Secondary outcomes were insulin resistance, androgens, lipids, anthropometrics, and nutritional intake.

Results: We found TRE was a feasible intervention with near-total compliance in those completing the intervention; however, there were considerable difficulties with recruitment. Of n=68 eligible to participate, n=40 declined. Ultimately, n=15 were recruited, with n=9 completing data collection to date (n=4 (27%) drop-outs due to commitment/study duration). There were no serious adverse events in the TRE group. Compliance(%(SD)) with TRE was 94(4.6)%, and n=8 were keen to continue TRE. There was no significant difference with TRE on insulin-related parameters. There was significant decrease in weight (-1.5kg (-2.7, -0.1), P=0.01), BMI (-0.52 (-0.99, -0.04), P=0.02) and hip circumferences (-2cm (-4, -2), P=0.01) in the TRE vs ab-libitum eating group. There was significant weight gain seen in the ad-libitum eating group (2.65kg (0.3, 3.5), P<0.001). Those following TRE had favourable changes in SHBG (2.4nmol/l (0.25, 6.2), P=0.04) and Apolipoprotein A1 (-0.02g/l (-0.06, 0), P=0.01) in androgen and lipid profiles. Those in the TRE group consumed significantly less energy (calories) (P=0.002), carbohydrate (P=0.03), saturated fat (P=0.03), and calcium (P=0.02) with no difference in sugar, protein, fat, or vitamin D consumption.

Conclusion: TRE was a safe and feasible intervention, however there was poor recruitment (13.2% of eligible group). With limited numbers, the TRE group had improvements in metabolic indices and lost more weight than the ‘ad-libitum’ group.

Volume 94

Society for Endocrinology BES 2023

Glasgow, UK
13 Nov 2023 - 15 Nov 2023

Society for Endocrinology 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.