SFEBES2026 Poster Presentations Late Breaking (54 abstracts)
1Kings College London, London, United Kingdom; 2Department of Diabetes, St Thomas Hospital, Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Background: Obesity is a major determinant of inpatient morbidity, length of stay and treatment complexity, with over 1.2 million obesity-related hospital admissions in England each year. Accurate BMI documentation is the gateway to identifying obesity in hospitalised patients. Four medical wards were identified as having the lowest BMI-recording rates in a London hospital, representing a priority area for targeted improvement.
Aim: To improve BMI recording by at least 10 percentage points across four medical wards within 12 weeks.
Methods: EPICs SlicerDicer enabled automated extraction of BMI completion and classification across baseline, PDSA-1 and PDSA-2 measurement periods. A multidisciplinary root-cause analysis identified alert fatigue, workflow fragmentation and low situational awareness of missing BMI data as key barriers. PDSA-1 implemented passive prompts (posters, computer-station reminder cards). PDSA-2 introduced an active behavioural intervention: a nurse-led five-minute weekly huddle embedded into morning handover, incorporating rapid teaching, role allocation and peer reinforcement. Outcomes were BMI-recording proportion and inpatient obesity prevalence (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). Proportions were compared using chi-square testing.
Results: PDSA-1 learning directly shaped an improved PDSA-2. BMI recording rose from 62.23% to 78.67%, a +16.4-point absolute and 26% relative improvement (χ² = 18.24; p = 0.000019). The increase in obesity prevalence during PDSA-1 (17.2% → 26.8%) reflected case-mix variation, as recording rates were unchanged. Prevalence increased to 22.9% in PDSA-2 once BMI capture improved, indicating enhanced case-finding. Weekly run charts demonstrated clear special-cause variation emerging only after PDSA-2.
| Period | Total patients | BMI recorded n (%) | Obesity (BMI ≥30) n (%) |
| Baseline | 575 | 358 (62.23%) | 89 (17.2%) |
| PDSA-1 | 551 | 343 (62.3%) | 92 (26.8%) |
| PDSA-2 | 497 | 391 (78.67%) | 114 (22.9%) |
Conclusion: A workflow-integrated, co-designed huddle was markedly more effective than passive prompts, resulting in significant improvements in BMI documentation and obesity identification. This low-cost, staff-owned model provides a scalable approach for embedding obesity recognition within routine inpatient care.