Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2009) 19 P246

SFEBES2009 Poster Presentations Pituitary (56 abstracts)

The high dose dexamethasone suppression test is dead

Thomas Siamatras , Niki Karavitaki & JAH Wass


Department of Endocrinology, Oxford, UK.


Introduction: The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome (CS) requires a screening test of high sensitivity, followed by biochemical evaluation aiming to identify the aetiology of hypercortisolism. The high-dose dexamethasone suppression test (HDDST) with the corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) test is commonly used for the differential diagnosis of ACTH-depended Cushing’s syndrome. However, the diagnostic utility of the HDDST has been questioned.

Aim: To compare the diagnostic profile of various combinations of the above tests for the differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent CS.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively analysed the results of 78 patients with Cushing’s disease (CD, n=72) or ectopic Cushing’s syndrome (ECS, n=6) ((mean age=42, F=59(75.6%)) who underwent LDDST (n=59), HDDST (n=77) and CRH test (n=65).The diagnostic profile of various combinations of these tests were assessed by constructing Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves.

Results: For the differential diagnosis of CD versus ECS the tests showed:

-Suppression of serum cortisol more than 27.8% at 48 h on the LDDST had a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 67% (n=59)

-Suppression of serum cortisol more than 53.5% at 48 h on the HDDST had a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 58% (n=77)

-Increase of serum cortisol more than 27.6% on CRH test had a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 84% (n=58)

-Increase of serum ACTH more than 58.6% on CRH test had a sensitivity of 78.5% and specificity of 100% (n=58)

-Suppression of serum cortisol more than 27.8% at 48 h on the LDDST and/or increase of serum cortisol more than 27.5% on the CRH test (n=47) had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 100%.

Conclusion: LDDST combined with the CRH test provided excellent diagnostic utility in all cases. With the criteria used the HDDST does not increase diagnostic sensitivity compared to LDDST.

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.

My recently viewed abstracts