Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2016) 44 P243 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.44.P243

SFEBES2016 Poster Presentations Thyroid (26 abstracts)

Evaluation of clinical diagnosis of Graves’ or Non-Graves’ Hyperthyroidism Compared to Gold-Standard TRAb Test

Lauren Bell 1, & Akheel Syed 1,


1Department of Endocrinology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK; 2Manchester Medical School, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.


Background: TSH receptor antibody (TRAb) measurement, with a sensitivity of >97% and specificity of 100%, is considered the gold standard investigation for diagnosing Graves’ disease (GD).

Aim: To evaluate clinical diagnosis of GD or non- GD hyperthyroidism at a University Teaching Hospital compared to TRAb result.

Methods: Electronic records of patients who had a TRAb measurement between December 2009 and October 2015 were studied retrospectively for a pre-TRAb clinical diagnosis of GD or non-GD. We examined descriptive statistics and binary classification tests; Fisher exact test was used to analyse contingency tables.

Results: We identified 316 patients seen in the Endocrinology service aged 18–89 years with a mean ± standard error of 45.2±2.5 years; 247 (78%) were women. A clear pre-test clinical diagnosis was identified in 160 patients; the remaining 156 patients had differential diagnoses and were excluded for this analysis. Of the 166 patients, a clinical diagnosis of GD was identified in 93 patients, of which 67 were TRAb-positive, 19 were TRAb-negative and 7 were TRAb-borderline; 67 patients had a pre-test clinical diagnosis of non-GD, of which 47 were TRAb-negative, 15 TRAb-positive and 5 TRAb-borderline. After excluding TRAb-borderline patients, clinical diagnosis had a sensitivity of 82%, specificity 71%, positive predictive value 78%, negative predictive value 76%, false negative rate 18%, and false positive rate 29% (P < 0.0001). Incorrect initial clinical diagnoses were corrected at subsequent appointments based on the TRAb result.

Conclusion(s): Clinicians were liable to incorrectly make an initial clinical diagnosis of non-GD in 1 in 5 patients with TRAb-positive GD, whilst 3 in 10 patients with TRAb-negative non-GD were incorrectly mislabelled as GD clinically. The TRAb test can help reduce the number of incorrect or unknown diagnoses in the initial clinical assessment of patients presenting with hyperthyroidism.

Volume 44

Society for Endocrinology BES 2016

Brighton, UK
07 Nov 2016 - 09 Nov 2016

Society for Endocrinology 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.