NANETS2024 17th Annual Multidisciplinary NET Medical Symposium NANETS 2024 Clinical - Chemo/SSA/Biologics (19 abstracts)
1Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN; 2Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; 3Wright Center of Innovation & IROC, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH; 4University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; 5University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; 6Alliance Protocol Operations Office, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; 7Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; 8The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; 9Washington University School of Medicine and Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO; 10University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM; 11Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; 12Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA; 13Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; 14MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 15Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; 16National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; 17Boston Medical Center and Boston University, Boston, MA; 18Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
Background: NETs are sensitive to VEGF pathway inhibitors. We compared cabozantinib (CABO), a multi-kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR, c-MET, AXL and RET, with placebo (PB) in a phase 3 trial including previously treated patients (pts) with advanced NET (NCT03375320). The study was stopped early and unblinded, per DSMB recommendations, based on interim results showing improvement in PFS by local radiology assessment (ESMO 2023). Final analyses of PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR), objective response rate (ORR), subgroup analyses, and safety are presented.
Methods: Pts with locally advanced or metastatic extra-pancreatic NET (epNET) or pancreatic NET (pNET) were randomized 2:1 in separately powered cohorts to receive CABO 60 mg daily vs PB. Eligibility: progression by RECIST within 12 months (mo) prior to registration, ≥ 1 prior therapy. Prespecified primary endpoint: PFS by BICR. Secondary endpoints: ORR, overall survival (OS), safety.
Results: 203 pts with epNET and 95 pts with pNET were randomized through the data cutoff of 8/24/2023. Primary tumor sites for pts with epNET included GI tract 57%, lung 19%, unknown 12%. In both cohorts, CABO significantly improved PFS by BICR and resulted in higher confirmed ORR (Table). Across clinical subgroups, including primary tumor site and prior anticancer therapy, PFS favored CABO. Grade 3+ treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were higher in the CABO arm; no new safety signals were noted. The most common ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events in the epNET cohort included hypertension (21%), fatigue (13%) and diarrhea (11%); in the pNET cohort, they included hypertension (22%), fatigue (11%) and thromboembolic events (11%).
CABO - epNET (n = 134) | PB - epNET (n = 69) | CABO - pNET (n = 64) | PB - pNET (n = 31) | |
Median PFS (BICR), months | 8.5 | 4.0 | 13.8 | 4.5 |
Stratified HR (95% CI) | 0.38 (0.25-0.58) | Ref | 0.23 (0.12-0.42) | REF |
Ref Stratified log-rank p-value | P < 0.0001 | P < 0.0001 | ||
Confirmed ORR (BICR), n (%) | ||||
Partial response | 7 (5%) | 0 | 12 (19%) | 0 |
Stable disease | 87 (65%) | 37 (54%) | 39 (61%) | 17 (55%) |
Progressive disease | 15 (11%) | 24 (35%) | 5 (8%) | 12 (39%) |
Not evaluable/missing | 25 (19%) | 8 (12%) | 8 (13%) | 2 (6%) |
Conclusions: CABO demonstrates significant improvement in PFS by BICR in epNET and pNET. AEs are consistent with the known safety profile of CABO. CABO may be a new treatment option for pts with previously treated, advanced NET.
ABSTRACT ID28623