Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2025) 110 EP1095 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.110.EP1095

ECEESPE2025 ePoster Presentations Pituitary, Neuroendocrinology and Puberty (220 abstracts)

Treatment-resistant gh-secreting pituitary adenoma in young patient harboring a variant somatic mutation of the gnas gene: a case report

Pakanut Pitupan 1 , Prapai Dejkhamron 1 & Karn Wejaphikul 1


1Chiang Mai university, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai, Thailand


JOINT3342

Background: Growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenomas are rare in children. Surgical removal is the first-line treatment, while persistent disease may require long-acting somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs), with or without dopamine agonists. This study presents a pediatric case resistant to multiple transsphenoidal surgeries, first- and second-generation SRLs, and bromocriptine therapy.

Method: Clinical data were reviewed, and whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on peripheral blood leukocytes and tumor tissue.

Results: A 12-year-old girl presented with tall stature since age five, along with headaches and blurred vision. She denied galactorrhea, polyuria, or polydipsia. Examination revealed a height of 172 cm (+3.43 SDS), mid-parental height of 157.5 cm, weight of 84 kg (+4.56 SDS), enlarged hands and feet, bitemporal hemianopia, and Tanner stage V for breast and pubic hair. Laboratory tests showed elevated IGF-1 (721 ng/ml), non-suppressible GH (>40 ng/ml), and prolactin 41.3 ng/ml (3-24). Other hormone levels were within normal ranges (FT4 1.06 ng/dl (0.98-1.63), TSH 1.09 µIU/ml (0.51-4.30), stimulated cortisol 20.2 µg/dl, LH 3.88 IU/l, FSH 4.46 IU/l, estradiol 38.4 pg/ml). Bone age was 15 years. Brain MRI revealed a 2.1×2.6×2.4 cm sellar and suprasellar mass encasing the internal carotid artery and extending into the cavernous sinus, consistent with a GH-producing pituitary macroadenoma. The patient underwent craniotomy, with histopathology confirming a GH-positive pituitary adenoma. WES identified a heterozygous missense c.2530C>T (p.Arg844Cys) variant in the GNAS gene in tumor tissue, absent in leukocytes, suggesting a somatic mutation. Three months post-surgery, GH remained elevated (nadir 30.8 ng/ml) with IGF-1 at 617 ng/ml, and a residual tumor (0.76×0.84 cm) was noted. A second transsphenoidal surgery and monthly octreotide LAR (20–60 mg) failed to achieve biochemical control, with a nadir GH of 5.42 ng/ml and IGF-1 of 602 ng/ml. Pasireotide LAR and bromocriptine were administered, but GH levels fluctuated between 1.79–7.15 ng/ml and IGF-1 remained at 555–575 ng/ml. At ages 16 and 17, the patient underwent a third and fourth surgery, but GH levels remained uncontrolled (nadir 6.86 ng/ml). Pegvisomant was considered but unavailable. She is now scheduled for proton radiation therapy.

Conclusions: We report a treatment-resistant GH-secreting pituitary adenoma in a pediatric patient harboring a somatic GNAS mutation. Managing such cases remains challenging, particularly in children. Stereotactic or proton radiotherapy should be considered when surgery and medical therapy fail to achieve biochemical control.

Volume 110

Joint Congress of the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology (ESPE) and the European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) 2025: Connecting Endocrinology Across the Life Course

European Society of Endocrinology 
European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches