ECEESPE2025 ePoster Presentations Pituitary, Neuroendocrinology and Puberty (220 abstracts)
1Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom; 2University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
JOINT2991
Background: Rathkes cleft cysts (RCCs) are benign, sellar or suprasellar cystic lesions of the pituitary gland. While frequently incidental, they can cause symptoms due to mass effects (headaches and/or visual disturbances) or due to endocrine dysfunction. Optimal management remains debated. This review examines the natural history of non-operated RCCs (radiological and endocrine progression) in a single-centre UK cohort.
Methods: Single-centre retrospective review of non-operated RCCs that were conservatively managed between 1/1/2021 and 31/12/2024. Data collection- demographics, presenting symptoms, endocrine function, radiological findings, follow-up outcomes.
Results: 45 patients identified (median age 54 years at diagnosis, IQR 32 67 years, range 14 88 years). 31/45 (68.9%) diagnosed incidentally. Most common presenting symptom amongst non-incidental cases: headache (10/14, 71.4%). At diagnosis, 42/45 (93.3%) eupituitary. 3/45 (6.7%): hypopituitary (low growth hormone levels, arginine vasopressin deficiency, panhypopituitary with raised prolactin). At diagnosis, median cyst size (maximal diameter) 6 mm (IQR 5 9 mm). All had full visual fields to confrontation. 1st follow-up: 28/45 (25 eupituitary, 3 endocrine deficit) (62.2%) received follow-up imaging. Median interval to 1st follow-up- 12 months (IQR 7.5 12 months, range 6 48 months). 17/45 (37.8%)- waiting for 1st follow-up scan. Biochemical and visual field findings: At 1st follow-up, 25 eupituitary patients at diagnosis, none developed new endocrine deficits. In the 3 patients with endocrine deficits at diagnosis, deficits remained the same. All patients (28/28)- normal visual fields. Subsequent follow-up: Median interval to most recent follow-up- 24 months (IQR 12.75 58.50 months, range 7 126 months). Biochemical and visual field findings: At most recent follow-up, 25 eupituitary patients at diagnosis, none developed new endocrine deficits. In the 3 patients with endocrine deficits at diagnosis, deficits remained the same. 27/28 (96.4%) normal visual fields, 1/28 (3.6%)- left inferotemporal visual field defect secondary to haemorrhage at 15 months after diagnosis.
No. of patients | Outcome |
24 (85.7%) | Stable |
2 (7.1%) | Shrinkage |
1 (3.6%) | Growth |
1 (3.6%) | Haemorrhage |
No. of patients | Outcome |
20 (71.4%) | Stable |
4 (14.3%) | Shrinkage |
2 (7.1%) | Growth |
2 (7.1%) | Haemorrhage |
Conclusion: The majority of RCCs in our cohort remained stable or regressed, with a low risk of developing new endocrine deficits. Conservative management appears safe, with routine hormonal screening potentially unnecessary in asymptomatic patients. We propose a patient-initiated follow-up based on symptomatic presentation instead of routine screening of non-operated RCCs. Future retrospective and prospective studies with longer periods of monitoring are warranted to further refine surveillance strategies.