Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2025) 110 EP1098 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.110.EP1098

ECEESPE2025 ePoster Presentations Pituitary, Neuroendocrinology and Puberty (220 abstracts)

Natural history and clinical behaviour of non-operated rathke’s cleft cysts: a single-centre retrospective review

Trevor Tam 1,2 , Francesca Swords 1 , Ketan Dhatariya 1,2 & Rupa Ahluwalia 1


1Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom; 2University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom


JOINT2991

Background: Rathke’s cleft cysts (RCCs) are benign, sellar or suprasellar cystic lesions of the pituitary gland. While frequently incidental, they can cause symptoms due to mass effects (headaches and/or visual disturbances) or due to endocrine dysfunction. Optimal management remains debated. This review examines the natural history of non-operated RCCs (radiological and endocrine progression) in a single-centre UK cohort.

Methods: Single-centre retrospective review of non-operated RCCs that were conservatively managed between 1/1/2021 and 31/12/2024. Data collection- demographics, presenting symptoms, endocrine function, radiological findings, follow-up outcomes.

Results: 45 patients identified (median age 54 years at diagnosis, IQR 32 – 67 years, range 14 – 88 years). 31/45 (68.9%) diagnosed incidentally. Most common presenting symptom amongst non-incidental cases: headache (10/14, 71.4%). At diagnosis, 42/45 (93.3%) eupituitary. 3/45 (6.7%): hypopituitary (low growth hormone levels, arginine vasopressin deficiency, panhypopituitary with raised prolactin). At diagnosis, median cyst size (maximal diameter) 6 mm (IQR 5 –9 mm). All had full visual fields to confrontation. 1st follow-up: 28/45 (25 eupituitary, 3 endocrine deficit) (62.2%) received follow-up imaging. Median interval to 1st follow-up- 12 months (IQR 7.5 – 12 months, range 6 – 48 months). 17/45 (37.8%)- waiting for 1st follow-up scan. Biochemical and visual field findings: At 1st follow-up, 25 eupituitary patients at diagnosis, none developed new endocrine deficits. In the 3 patients with endocrine deficits at diagnosis, deficits remained the same. All patients (28/28)- normal visual fields. Subsequent follow-up: Median interval to most recent follow-up- 24 months (IQR 12.75 – 58.50 months, range 7 – 126 months). Biochemical and visual field findings: At most recent follow-up, 25 eupituitary patients at diagnosis, none developed new endocrine deficits. In the 3 patients with endocrine deficits at diagnosis, deficits remained the same. 27/28 (96.4%) normal visual fields, 1/28 (3.6%)- left inferotemporal visual field defect secondary to haemorrhage at 15 months after diagnosis.

Table 1. Radiological findings:.
No. of patientsOutcome
24 (85.7%)Stable
2 (7.1%)Shrinkage
1 (3.6%)Growth
1 (3.6%)Haemorrhage
Table 1. Radiological findings:.
No. of patientsOutcome
20 (71.4%)Stable
4 (14.3%)Shrinkage
2 (7.1%)Growth
2 (7.1%)Haemorrhage

Conclusion: The majority of RCCs in our cohort remained stable or regressed, with a low risk of developing new endocrine deficits. Conservative management appears safe, with routine hormonal screening potentially unnecessary in asymptomatic patients. We propose a patient-initiated follow-up based on symptomatic presentation instead of routine screening of non-operated RCCs. Future retrospective and prospective studies with longer periods of monitoring are warranted to further refine surveillance strategies.

Volume 110

Joint Congress of the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology (ESPE) and the European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) 2025: Connecting Endocrinology Across the Life Course

European Society of Endocrinology 
European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches