ECEESPE2025 Oral Communications Oral Communications 2: Diabetes and Insulin Part 1 (6 abstracts)
1Copenhagen University Hospital North Zealand, Hilleroed, Denmark; 2Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark; 3Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
JOINT55
Objective: The DIATEC trial investigates the glycaemic and clinical effects of inpatient continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-guided insulin titration by diabetes teams.
Research design and methods: This two-centre trial randomised 166 non-intensive care unit patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes management was performed by regular staff, guided by diabetes teams using insulin titration algorithms based on either point-of-care glucose testing or CGM. The primary outcome was the difference in time in range (TIR) (3.910.0 mmol/l) between the two arms. Outcomes were assessed during the entire hospitalisation.
Results: The CGM-arm achieved a higher TIR (median, IQR) of 77.6% (24.4) vs 62.7% (31.5) in the POC-arm (P<.001). Time above range (TAR) >10.0 mmol/l was lower in the CGM-arm of (median, IQR) 21.1% (24.8) vs 36.5% (30.3) in the POC-arm (P=.001). Time below range (TBR) <3.9 mmol/l was reduced by CGM, with a relative difference to POC of 0.57 (95% CI 0.340.97) (P=.042). Prolonged hypoglycaemic events decreased (IRR 0.13, 95% CI 0.040.46) (P=.001), and the coefficient of variation (mean, SD) was lower in the CGM-arm of 25.4% (6.3) vs 28.0% (8.2) in the POC-arm (P=.024). Total insulin doses (mean, SD) were reduced in the CGM-arm with 24.1 IU/day (13.9) vs 29.3 IU/day (13.9) in the POC-arm (P=.049). A composite of complications was lower in the CGM-arm (IRR 0.76, 95% CI 0.590.98) (P=.032).
Conclusions: In-hospital CGM increased TIR by 15%-points, mainly by reducing TAR. CGM also lowered TBR, glycaemic variability, prolonged hypoglycaemic events, insulin usage, and in-hospital complications.