Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2025) 110 P734 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.110.P734

ECEESPE2025 Poster Presentations MTEabolism, Nutrition and Obesity (125 abstracts)

Association of childhood BMI with height growth pattern and adult stature: mendelian randomization study

Zhu Benlong 1 & Ruimin Chen 1


1Department of Endocrinology, Genetics, and Metabolism, Fuzhou First General Hospital, affiliated with Fujian Medical University/Fuzhou Children’s Hospital, Fujian Province, China., Fuzhou, China


JOINT2746

Objective: Observational studies have reported that childhood body mass index (BMI) affects height growth patterns without significantly effecting adult stature. The causal relationship remain unclear. Mendelian randomization (MR)—a genetic instrumental variable approach leveraging Mendel’s second law to minimize confounding—was employed to assess causality between childhood BMI and height growth patterns, including pre-pubertal growth (age≤10 years), total pubertal height growth, late pubertal height growth, and adult stature, (standing and sitting height).

Methods: Adhering to the STROBE-MR guidelines. Whole genome-wide association study (GWAS) data were extracted from the MRC-IEU GWAS database (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk). Causal estimates were derived using inverse variance weighting (IVW) as the primary method, supplemented by MR–Egger regression, weighted median, weighted mode, and simple mode analyses. Sensitivity analyses included Cochran’s Q test for heterogeneity, MR–Egger’s intercept and the MR-PRESSO test for pleiotropy assessment, and leave-one-out SNPs exclusion to evaluate robustness.

Results: MR analyses revealed childhood BMI exhibited a positive causal effect on pre-pubertal height growth (β=0.11, 95%CI [0.08, 0.13], P=1.13×10¹3). But inversely negative correlated with total pubertal height growth (males: β=-0.40, 95%CI: [-0.61, -0.18], P=2.64×10-4; females: β=-0.61, 95%CI: [-0.85, -0.36]; P=9.49×10-7), late pubertal height growth (males:β=-0.52, 95%CI: [-0.75, -0.28], P=2.46×10-5; females: β=-0.45; 95%CI: [-0.68, -0.21], P=2.02×10-4). No significant link between childhood BMI and adult standing or sitting height. Sensitivity analysis revealed absence of horizontal pleiotropy (MR-Egger intercept P>0.05) and outlier SNPs (MR-PRESSO P>0.05), with leave-one-out’ tests demonstrating results stablity.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates dual-phase effects: positively influencing early childhood height acceleration but suppressing pubertal growth trajectories. These transient effects resolve by adulthood, with no measurable impact on final stature. Findings underscore BMI’s role as a modulator of developmental tempo rather than a determinant of adult height.

Keywords Mendelian randomization, Childhood BMI, Height growth pattern, Adult stature

Volume 110

Joint Congress of the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology (ESPE) and the European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) 2025: Connecting Endocrinology Across the Life Course

European Society of Endocrinology 
European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches