Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2025) 110 EP222 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.110.EP222

ECEESPE2025 ePoster Presentations Bone and Mineral Metabolism (142 abstracts)

Prevention of rebound hypercalcemia in giant cell bone lesions treated with denosumab: a critical comparison of two different approaches

Alessandro Barbato 1,2 , Nicolò Chiti 1 , Matteo Cerutti 1,2 , Renato Vaiasuso 1,2 , Matteo Pontone 1,2 , Giovanni Beltrami 3 , Carmela Enrichiello 4 , Ilaria Brizzi 5 , Franco Ricci 1 & Stefano Stagi 1,2


1Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, Auxo-endocrinology Unit, Florence, Italy; 2University of Florence, Department of Health Sciences, Florence, Italy; 3Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, Department of Orthopedic, Traumatology and Paediatric Orthopaedic Oncology, Florence, Italy; 4Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Florence, Italy; 5Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, Pediatric Unit, Florence, Italy


JOINT1856

Background: Denosumab is a monoclonal anti-RANK-L receptor antibody used to treat a wide range of bone lesions, including fibrous dysplasia, osteogenesis imperfecta, aneurysmal bone cysts, giant cell granuloma (GCG) and giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in both adults and children. The use of denosumab in pediatric patients is associated with a high risk of rebound hypercalcemia upon discontinuation. This condition often requires hospitalization and, in some cases, bisphosphonates to normalize calcium levels. Based on the clinical course of two patients with GCG treated with denosumab, we propose a preventive approach to rebound hypercalcemia.

Case presentation: Patient 1 was a 7-year-10-month-old boy who presented with maxillary swelling. MRI revealed a left maxillary mass (50x50x57mm), and pathology confirmed the diagnosis of GCG. Neoadjuvant treatment with denosumab (120 mg) was initiated with loading doses at T0, followed by doses at T15 and T45. T8 was not performed due to phosphaturia. Loading doses were followed by monthly doses of 100 mg for 8 months. The dose was gradually reduced to 20 mg over 6 months and discontinued after a total of 16 months of treatment. Follow-up MRI showed size reduction of the lesion to 45x54x37mm. Despite the tapering, the patient developed severe rebound hypercalcemia 2 months after discontinuation (total serum calcium increased to 15.8 mg/dl), requiring hospitalization and treatment with intravenous hydration, furosemide, oral glucocorticoids and endovenous zoledronate (dose 0.05 mg/kg/dose). Patient 2 was a 16-year-2-month-old boy referred for a costal lesion, which was diagnosed as GCTB after biopsy. Denosumab treatment was started with a dose of 120 mg at T0, followed by 100 mg (due to hypophosphatemia) at T8 (T15 was not performed due to hypophosphatemia) and T45. Monthly doses were then administered and reduced to 40 mg within 3 months. One month after suspension, the patient received 2 mg (dose 0.03 mg/kg/dose) of intravenous zoledronate. Follow-up CT scan showed a stable size of the lesion with increased calcification. Six months after discontinuation, the patient successfully underwent surgical removal of the lesion, and his serum calcium levels remained within the normal range.

Discussion: Prevention of rebound hypercalcemia after suspension of denosumab may be challenging and tapering alone may not suffice. We propose a stepwise approach to the adverse events associated with denosumab involving strict monitoring for hypocalcemia and hypophosphatemia (which should be promptly corrected), and the administration of zoledronate at least one month after suspension to prevent rebound hypercalcemia.

Volume 110

Joint Congress of the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology (ESPE) and the European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) 2025: Connecting Endocrinology Across the Life Course

European Society of Endocrinology 
European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches