Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2025) 110 OC14.4 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.110.OC14.4

1Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland; 2Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States; 3Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 4UNIVERSITY MIGUEL HERNANDEZ, Alicante, Spain; 5Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, United States; 6Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; 7Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; 8Nara Medical University, Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Kashihara, Japan; 9University of Washington/Puget Sound VA/SIBCR, Issaquah, United States; 10Washington University, Clayton, United States; 11Mayo Clinic College of Medicine (Rochester) Endocrine Fellowship Program, Rochester, United States; 12Ascendis Pharma, Ind., Palo Alto, United States; 13University of Arizona College of Medicine and Creighton School of Medicine, Phoenix, United States


JOINT3277

Background: Adult growth hormone deficiency (aGHD) is characterized by metabolic abnormalities due to insufficient growth hormone (GH) production. Lonapegsomatropin was designed to provide release of unmodified somatropin, and once-weekly injection reduces the burden of daily GH replacement therapy.

Methods: ForesiGHt was a randomized, parallel-3-arm, placebo-controlled (double-blind) and active-controlled (open-label) trial to establish the efficacy and safety of lonapegsomatropin in aGHD. 259 adults with GHD across 21 countries who were GH treatment-naïve or not treated with GH in the prior year, randomized 1:1:1 to receive lonapegsomatropin, once-weekly placebo, or daily somatropin. Fixed dosing was based on age and oral estrogen intake, designed to be comparable across lonapegsomatropin and somatropin arms. Following a 12-week (w) titration to target maintenance dose, fixed doses were administered for 26w.

Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between arms. Lonapegsomatropin demonstrated superiority on the primary efficacy endpoint of change from baseline (CFB) in trunk percent fat at 38w vs placebo (lonapegsomatropin -1.7%, placebo 0.4%, LS mean difference -2.0%, P<0.0001) and key secondary efficacy endpoints of CFB in total body lean mass (lonapegsomatropin 1.6 kg, placebo -0.1 kg, LS mean difference 1.7 kg, P<0.0001) and CFB in trunk fat mass (lonapegsomatropin -0.5 kg, placebo 0.2 kg, LS mean difference -0.7 kg, P=0.0053). Mean total exposure and maintenance doses were similar for lonapegsomatropin and somatropin arms, with larger CFB in average IGF-I SDS mean at 38w in the lonapegsomatropin arm (1.4) vs somatropin arm (0.5). To assess outcomes at comparable weekly IGF-I exposure, a post-hoc analysis was done in participant subsets with average IGF-I SDS ≤1.75 SDS at 38w. Mean IGF-I SDS for these subsets were similar (lonapegsomatropin -0.1, somatropin -0.5), with comparable effects in fat and lean tissue compartments (CFB in trunk percent fat mean -2.4% and -2.6% respectively; CFB in total body lean mass mean 1.7 kg and 1.4 kg respectively). In the safety population, the incidence of severe AEs was low (lonapegsomatropin, 3.4%; placebo, 1.2%; somatropin, 2.3%) and the incidence of treatment-related AEs was similar (lonapegsomatropin 24.7%, somatropin 22.1%). Injection site reaction incidence was low and similar for lonapegsomatropin (4.5%), somatropin (5.8%) and placebo (4.8%), and A1c levels remained stable in all treatment arms.

Conclusions: The results of the foresiGHt trial indicate that lonapegsomatropin is an efficacious and tolerable replacement for endogenous GH. Once-weekly dosing may be impactful for adults with GHD who typically manage multiple other medical therapies.

Volume 110

Joint Congress of the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology (ESPE) and the European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) 2025: Connecting Endocrinology Across the Life Course

European Society of Endocrinology 
European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches