Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2025) 110 P1086 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.110.P1086

ECEESPE2025 Poster Presentations Thyroid (141 abstracts)

Timing of levothyroxine ingestion in the INFINITY-study: a randomized controlled trial comparing dose-adjusted, non-fasting and fasting levothyroxine ingestion

Jeresa Willems 1 , Daan van Twist 1 , Floris Helmich 1 , Marco Medici 2 , Robin Peeters 2 & Roderick Tummers - de Lind van Wijngaarden 1


1Zuyderland Medical Center, Internal Medicine, Heerlen/Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands; 2Erasmus Medical Center, Internal Medicine, Rotterdam, Netherlands


JOINT700

Background: Levothyroxine (LT4) co-ingestion with food may lead to reduced absorption and increased thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels. Therefore, fasting ingestion is recommended. Yet, in a recent study we found that the majority of patients are burdened by fasting ingestion. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether dose-adjusted, non-fasting LT4 ingestion could achieve stability of TSH levels comparable to fasting ingestion.

Methods: Patients were randomized to a fasting group, taking LT4 as usually recommended, or a non-fasting group, ingesting LT4 with breakfast after increasing the baseline LT4 dose by 15% to compensate for reduced absorption due to non-fasting ingestion. TSH, free T4 (FT4) and total T3 (TT3) levels were measured every six weeks until study completion. Patients were followed for 12 weeks in case two consecutive TSH levels fell within reference range. If TSH was out of range, follow-up was extended to 18 or 24 weeks. TSH stability was defined as a mean difference in TSH from baseline to study end ranging between -1 and +1mIU/l.

Results: Eighty-eight patients (80.7% female, median age 62y [IQR:49-69]) were randomized: 43 to the fasting and 45 to the non-fasting group. No significant differences were observed between the fasting and non-fasting group in mean difference of TSH (+0.22±1.00mIU/l vs. +0.22±0.92, p=NS), FT4 (-0.48±2.41 vs. -0.96±2.75pmol/l, p=NS) and TT3 (0.07±0.18 vs. 0.08±0.22nmol/l, p=NS), respectively. TSH stability was achieved in 71.8% of the fasting group and 73.2% of the non-fasting group (p=NS). By study end, 93.3% of the non-fasting group preferred to continue taking LT4 with breakfast.

Conclusion: Dose-adjusted, non-fasting LT4 ingestion achieved TSH stability comparable to conventional fasting LT4 ingestion. Therefore, this could be considered as an alternative to fasting LT4 ingestion.

Volume 110

Joint Congress of the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology (ESPE) and the European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) 2025: Connecting Endocrinology Across the Life Course

European Society of Endocrinology 
European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches