Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2025) 116 C30 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.116.C30

NANETS2025 18th Annual Multidisciplinary NET Medical Symposium NANETS 2025 Clinical – Nuclear Medicine/Interventional Radiology/Imaging (22 abstracts)

DISCO: Safety, Tolerability and Diagnostic performance of 64Cu-SARTATE compared to 68Ga-DOTATATE in patients with known or suspected neuroendocrine tumors

Eva Lengyelova 1 , Nimit Singhal 2 , Veronica Wong 3 , Ellen Van Dam 1 , Rod Hicks 4 , Monique Anderson 1 , Jared Driskill 1 , Erica Sztangret 1 & Michelle Parker 1


1Clarity Pharmaceuticals; 2Royal Adelaide Hospital; 3Nepean Hospital; 4University of Melbourne, School of Medicine, St Vincent’s Hospital


Background: Diagnostic imaging is critical in the diagnosis, staging, management, and follow-up of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Characteristics of 64Cu-SARTATE may provide advantages over existing imaging, including 68Ga-DOTATATE, because of its longer half-life and potential to detect additional disease.

Methods: This Phase I/II study assessed the safety and efficacy of 64Cu-SARTATE (200 MBq) in participants with known or suspected gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-NETs. Participants were assessed with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT within 35 days prior to 64Cu-SARTATE administration, with the 64Cu-SARTATE PET/CT performed at 4 ± 1 hrs (same-day) and 20 ± 4 hrs (next-day) post-injection. Scans were assessed by 2 independent blinded central readers. Discordant lesions (lesions present on only one scan, either 64Cu-SARTATE or 68Ga-DOTATATE) were subsequently evaluated by an independent assessor against the standard of truth (biopsy and/or conventional imaging, collected during a follow-up period of up to 12-month ). Per-lesion sensitivity, specificity, and lesion detection rate of both 64Cu-SARTATE timepoints were compared to 68Ga-DOTATATE among those with discordant findings. Safety was assessed via vital signs, laboratory tests, physical examinations, ECGs and adverse event (AE) reporting.

Results: 45 participants were enrolled , 41 with known NETs and 4 with suspected NETs, across 4 sites in Australia. The number of lesions detected across readers ranged from 393-488 with 64Cu-SARTATE (both timepoints) and 186-265 for 68Ga-DOTATATE. 93.5% of 230-251 discordant lesions identified were detected on 64Cu-SARTATE, while only 6.5% of discordant lesions were identified on 68Ga-DOTATATE. Average lesion-level sensitivity of evaluable discordant lesions was 94.7% (95% CI 65.1, 99.5) for 64Cu-SARTATE (across both timepoints) compared to 5.4% (95% CI 0.5, 34.9) for 68Ga-DOTATATE. Average sensitivity on same-day 64Cu-SARTATE PET/CT was 95.1% (95% CI 80.1, 98.6) and 94.3% (95% CI 65.1, 99.5) on next-day PET/CT. Average specificity was 62.5% (95% CI 3.1, 99.5) for 64Cu-SARTATE (across both timepoints) and 37.5% (95% CI 0.5, 96.9) for 68Ga-DOTATATE, this was impacted by the low number of discordant lesions identified by 68Ga-DOTATATE. Seven (15.6%) participants experienced 64Cu-SARTATE-related AEs; 8 were Grade 1, 1 was Grade 2, mostly resolving within 2 days. No serious treatment-emergent AEs were observed.

Conclusions: 64Cu-SARTATE was found to be safe and well-tolerated. In participants with known or suspected GEP-NETs, 64Cu-SARTATE lesion detection outperformed that of 68Ga-DOTATATE. The improved diagnostic performance of 64Cu-SARTATE has important clinical implications for the identification of GEP-NET lesions to inform treatment pathways. A phase III study of 64Cu-SARTATE in NETs is being planned to build on these results.

Abstract ID #33463

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches