Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2015) 38 P326 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.38.P326

SFEBES2015 Poster Presentations Pituitary (48 abstracts)

Impaired quality of life in patients with acromegaly despite long-term disease control: results from a longitudinal study

Nikolaos Kyriakakis 1, , Julie Lynch 1 , John O’Dwyer 3 , Stephen G Gilbey 1 & Robert D Murray 1,


1Leeds Centre for Diabetes and Endocrinology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK; 2Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; 3Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.


Introduction: Patients with acromegaly are frequently left with long-term adverse sequelae. Cross-sectional evaluation of health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) using both generic and specific questionnaires (AcroQoL) has confirmed HR-QoL to be severely impaired in acromegaly. However, long-term HR-QoL outcomes following disease control have been less well-described.

Methods: The disease specific questionnaire AcroQoL and three validated generic questionnaires (the Psychological General Well-Being Schedule (PGWBS), the 36-item Short-Form (SF-36) health survey, and the EuroQol (EQ-5D)) were used to evaluate quality of life in 28 patients with acromegaly. Two sets of responses were obtained from each participant, within a time interval of minimum 5 years.

Results: Twenty-eight patients with acromegaly (male 46.4%, mean age at baseline 57.2±11.5 years) were assessed over a mean 5.68±0.6 years period, between baseline and follow-up responses. All patients had pituitary surgery, 57% required additional cranial radiotherapy and 50% medical treatment. Growth hormone levels at baseline and follow-up were 1.6±2.3 and 0.74±0.73 μg/l respectively (P=0.002), while IGF1 values were 102.4±63 and 105±52% of the upper limit of normal respectively (P=0.81). No difference in the scores of the AcroQoL (65.11±16.3 vs 66.11±19.1; P=0.66), PGWBS (66.29±20.9 vs 64.57±19.4; P=0.61), SF-36 (53.87±22.4% vs 48.96±23.9%; P=0.07), and EQ-5D (0.61±0.32 vs 0.55±0.32; P=0.32) were observed between baseline and follow-up responses. The physical domains of energy/fatigue, vitality, and bodily pain have been consistently the most under-marked areas in all questionnaires, in comparison with the psychological/emotional domains which were not as affected. The domain of physical function, in particular, was found to be significantly worse at follow-up compared with baseline, as assessed by the SF-36 (58.5±24.7% vs 43.1±31.1%; P=0.002).

Conclusions: Patients with acromegaly demonstrate impaired QoL which persists, despite long-term biochemical disease control. Physical limitations due to irreversible complications of acromegaly, such as arthropathy, appear to have the biggest impact on patients’ perceived quality of life.

Volume 38

Society for Endocrinology BES 2015

Edinburgh, UK
02 Nov 2015 - 04 Nov 2015

Society for Endocrinology 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.