Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2020) 70 AEP277 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.70.AEP277

ECE2020 Audio ePoster Presentations Diabetes, Obesity, Metabolism and Nutrition (285 abstracts)

Association and predictive ability of maternal body composition parameters in early pregnancy to identify gestational diabetes mellitus

Alexandra Cremona 1,2,3,4 , Clodagh O’Gorman 1,4,5 , Khadijah Ismail 4 , Kevin Hayes 6 , Alan Donnelly 1,7 , Jill Hamilton 8 & Amanda Cotter 4,9


1Health Research Institute (HRI), University of Limerick, Ireland; 2University of Limerick, School of Allied Health (SAH), Ireland; 3Irish Nutrition & Dietetics Insititute (INDI), Ireland; 4University of Limerick, Graduate Entry Medical School (GEMS), Ireland; 5University Hospital Limerick, Department of Paediatrics, Ireland; 6University College Cork (UCC), Department of Statistics, Ireland; 7University of Limerick, Physical Education and Sport Sciences (PESS), Ireland; 8The Hospital for Sick Children, The Division of Endocrinology, Department of Paediatrics, Canada; 9University Maternity Hospital Limerick (UMHL), Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Ireland


Background: Accurate early risk prediction for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) would target intervention and prevention in women at the highest risk. We evaluated maternal risk factors and parameters of body composition to develop a prediction model for GDM in early gestation.

Methods: A prospective observational study was undertaken. Pregnant women aged between 18–50 y of age with gestational age between 10–16 weeks were included in the study. Women aged ≤18 y, twin-pregnancies, known foetal anomaly or pre-existing condition affecting oedema status were excluded. 8-point skinfold thickness, MUAC, waist, hip, weight and ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous (SAT) and visceral abdominal adipose (VAT) were measured. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for GDM diagnosis was undertaken at 30w gestation. Binomial logistic regression models were used to predict GDM. ROC analysis determined discrimination and concordance of model and individual variables.

Results: 188 women underwent OGTT at 30 w gestation. 20 women developed GDM. BMI (24.7 kg.m2 (±6.1), 29.9 kg.m-2 (±7.8), P = .022), abdominal SAT (1.32 cm (CI 1.31–1.53),1.99 cm (CI 1.64–2.31), P = .027), abdominal VAT (.78 cm (CI .8–.96), 1.41 cm (CI 1.11–1.65), P = .002), truncal SFT (84.8 mm (CI 88.2–101.6), 130.4 mm (CI 105.1–140.1), P = .010), waist (79.8 cm (CI 80.3–84.1), 90.3 cm (CI 85.9–96.2), P = .006) and gluteal hip (94.3 cm (93.9-98.0), 108.6 cm (99.9–111.6), P = .023) were higher in GDM vs non-GDM. After screening variables for inclusion into the multivariate model, family history of diabetes, previous perinatal death, overall insulin resistant condition, abdominal SAT and VAT, 8-point SFT, MUAC and weight were included. The combined multivariate prediction model achieved an excellent level of discrimination, with an AUC of 0.860 (CI 0.774–0.945) for GDM.

Conclusions: An early gestation risk prediction model, which incorporates known risk factors, and parameters of body composition accurately identify pregnant women in their first trimester who developed GDM later on in gestation. This methodology could be used clinically to identify at risk pregnancies, and target specific treatment through referred services to those mothers who would most benefit.

Table 1 Concordance statistic (AUC) for all variables computed with receiver-operator curves(ROC) analyses for GDM, in order of descending AUC value (n = 16).
Predictive variableAUC95% CIp-value
VAT0.743.628–.858<0.0005**
Σ SAT & VAT0.739.618–.860<0.0005**
Truncal SFT0.730.613–.8460.002**
Subscapular SFT0.728.607–.8480.002**
Supraspinale SFT0.726.612–.8390.002**
Abdominal SFT0.722.605–.8390.003**
SAT0.713.58–.8390.002**
Σ 8-points SFT0.710.589–.8390.005**
Waist0.705.570–.8410.004**
Hip0.701.564–.8380.005**
Supra-iliac SFT0.699.585–.8140.007**
Thigh SFT0.681.564–.7990.014*
Weight0.676.537–.8150.015*
Appendicular SFT0.673.552–.7940.019*
BMI0.670.535–.8060.018*
Bicep SFT0.667.523–.8110.024*
Tricep SFT0.646.514–.7780.049*
MUAC0.639.496–.7810.055
Calf SFT0.637.501–.7730.064
* = statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05, **> = statistically significant at P ≤ 0.01.

Volume 70

22nd European Congress of Endocrinology

Online
05 Sep 2020 - 09 Sep 2020

European Society of Endocrinology 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.