Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2022) 81 P361 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.81.P361

ECE2022 Poster Presentations Diabetes, Obesity, Metabolism and Nutrition (202 abstracts)

Comparison of glycemic variability in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients on oral anti diabetic drugs (OAD) with and without insulin using ambulatory glucose profile (AGP)

Sidharth S 1 , Ramesh Aggarwal 1 , Anupam Prakash 1 , L H Ghotekar 1 & Meenakshi Aggarwal 2


1Lady Hardinge Medical College, Medicine, New Delhi, India; 2Kalawati Saran Children’s Hospital, Microbiology, New Delhi, India


Introduction: Assessment of diabetes with daily blood glucose fluctuations including peaks and nadirs forms the crux of the modern management. Use of glycemic variability (GV) as a parameter to assess these fluctuations is emerging. Diabetes mellitus patients follow different clinical trajectories which can be traced by the ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) obtained from flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS).

Methodology: This comparative observational study enrolled 106 adult (>18 years) type 2 diabetes patients with HbA1c<8% from a tertiary care hospital in India. Patients were divided into two groups (group A & group B) with 53 patients each. Group A included patients on OAD’s with insulin and Group B included patients on OAD’s without insulin. The patients were put on FGMS for 14 days and their AGP was analysed. Indices of glycemic variability like Mean, MAGE (Mean amplitude of glycemic excursion), SD (Standard deviation), COV (Coefficient of variation), time in target (TIT), time above target (TAT), time below target (TBT), MODD (Mean of daily differences) were computed using Mann Whitney test.

Results: Median (25th-75th percentile) of glycemic variability parameters - Mean(mg/dl), MAGE(mg/dl), SD(mg/dl), time above target(%), MODD in group A {Insulin} was {139, 145, 44.68, 40, 38.47} respectively which was significantly higher as compared to group B{OAD} {111, 123, 33.31, 18, 26.31} respectively (P<0.05). Time in target (%) depicting time in glucose range of 70–180 mg/dl and time below target was achieved more with group B{OAD} (54% & 12% ) as compared with group A {Insulin} (39% & 7%) respectively (P<0.05). No significant difference was found for COV between the groups. Amongst the OAD’s used in patients taking insulin {group A}, glycemic variability was higher with sulfonylurea as compared with DPP-4 inhibitors for the parameter of mean(mg/dl) and MODD (217.5 & 52.4 vs 126.5 & 31.38 respectively). DPP-4 inhibitors achieved higher time in target (53%) as compared with sulfonylurea (11%) (P<0.005). No significant difference in glycemic variability was found in subgroup analysis of group B (OAD) in our study. Group A patients had significantly higher (29.99%) total number of hyperglycemic episodes than with group B (9.08%) (p value<0.0001).

Conclusion: Our study showed that the glycemic variability was found to be significantly higher in patients taking OAD’s with insulin (group A) as compared with patients who were taking OAD’s without insulin (group B). DPP-4 inhibitor was found to achieve more time in target range with less glycemic variability as compared with sulfonylurea.

Volume 81

European Congress of Endocrinology 2022

Milan, Italy
21 May 2022 - 24 May 2022

European Society of Endocrinology 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.