Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2025) 116 C4 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.116.C4

1Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA; 2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; 3Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA; 4Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA


Background: The 2017 WHO classification established well-differentiated G3 NETs as a distinct pathologic entity. However, their rarity and heterogeneity have hindered the definition of standard treatment strategies. Hereby, we present a multicenter real-world experience from the Mayo Clinic to inform clinical practice.

Methods: Clinical data were collected across the three Mayo Clinic sites (Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida) including patients (pts) with histologically confirmed GEP-NETs G3 between 2017and 2025. Primary endpoints included ORR, DCR, PFS, and OS. Prognostic factors were analyzed with a multivariate Cox regression.

Results: 76 pts, median age 62 years (range, 23–83), with either ab inizio (88%) or transformed (12%) G3 GEP-NETs.The most common primary sites were pancreas (60%), small bowel (17%) and rectum (5%). The median Ki-67 was 35% (range, 20–90). Most cases were non-functional (70%). Among functional tumors, carcinoid syndrome and hypoglycemia were the most common presentations (each 11.8%). Overall, median plasma 5-HIAA level was 35.5 ng/mL (range, 5–1394). 85% had de novo metastatic disease and 18% recurrent disease. Metastatic sites included liver (91%), lymph nodes (32%), bone (22%), lung and peritoneum (each 8%). The median number of metastatic sites was 1 (range, 0–5). The median number of systemic lines was 2 (range, 0–8). Across all lines, the most frequent treatments were CAPTEM (23%), PRRT with lutetium-177 DOTATATE (14%), lanreotide (11%), octreotide (8%), carboplatin-etoposide (7%), sunitinib (5%), and everolimus (5%). Efficacy outcomes were reported in Table 1 for the three most common regimens based on radiology reports. At a median follow-up of 26.4 months, mOS of the overall population was 56.2 months (95% CI, 42.9–69.5). Insulin-producing tumors (HR 6.07, 95% CI 1.33–27.5; P = 0.02) and ≥2 metastatic sites (HR 3.53, 95% CI 1.55–8.05; P = 0.003) were independently associated with poor survival.

Table 1. Efficacy of the three most common regimens.
CAPTEMPRRT Lu-177Lanreotide
Line of therapy, n (%)
First24 (61.5)3 (12.5)11 (57.9)
Second7 (17.9)9 (37.5)8 (42.1)
Third or further8 (20.6)12 (50.1)0 (0)
DCR62.994.750
ORR37.157.911.1
mPFS, months (95% CI)6.7 (1.8-11.5)11.2 (0-27.0)3.4 (2.0-4.2)
mOS, months (95% CI)50.6 (15.5-85.7)76.1 (8.2-143.9)NR
Pooled efficacy outcomes across treatment lines.

Conclusions: Our experience underscores the use of CAPTEM and PRRT as preferred treatment choices in well-differentiated G3 GEP-NETs. Insulin secretion and metastatic burden were identified as independent predictors of poor prognosis.

Abstract ID #33418

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches